Re: upcoming libshout beta/snapshot

On 2015-04-20 07:52, "Thomas B. Rücker" wrote:
> On 04/20/2015 05:47 AM, Ralph Giles wrote:
>> On 19/04/15 08:15 PM, "Thomas B. Rücker" wrote:
>>
>>> If anyone happens to know about proven secure settings, just like the
>>> Mozilla labs settings for server side, please let us know.
>> You mean like https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS ?
> Yes, that's what we used for the Icecast server default cipher list, now
> if Mozilla has that for the *client* side, that would be interesting. I
> looked around but didn't see it.
> There seem to be subtle differences of what makes sense and what needs
> to be configured, when compared to a server.
>
> TBR

In my oppinion (for what it's worth) I'd go by:
Configuration 	Oldest compatible client
*Modern* 	Firefox 27, Chrome 22, IE 11, Opera 14, Safari 7, Android 4.4, 
Java 8
*Intermediate* 	Firefox 1, Chrome 1, IE 7, Opera 5, Safari 1, Windows XP 
IE8, Android 2.3, Java 7
*Old* 	Windows XP IE6, Java 6


By the looks of it Intermediate is the way to go for compatibility.
But perhaps a flag to change from intermediate to modern would be useful?

But if Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 are the oldest Windows 
(oldest WIndows that IE11 will install on) target then going for 
"modern" may be better.
It's Windows XP that is potentially holding back things. (are there any 
stats on this regarding icecast and libshout?)

-- 
Roger Hågensen, Freelancer, http://skuldwyrm.no/

_______________________________________________
Icecast-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast-dev