Re: I'm confused about latency
Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:51:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jackit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2019-04-04 at 18:19 +0200, Alexandre Bique wrote: > I've tried with qjackctl to set the periods/buffer to 12 with 2048 > samples per buffer at 44100 Hz which is about half a second of > latency. Do you manage to get the correct latency reported with those > settings? See https://imgur.com/w45wsp8 Hi, what's wrong with QjackCtl's calculation? For the calculation I found a page that seemingly contains a typo. "(Frames [or buffer] / Sample Rate ) * Periods = Latency in ms" - https://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/list_of_jack_frame_period_settings_ideal_for_usb_interface It should read "s" not "ms". (2048 frames / 44100 Hz sample rate) * 12 periods = 0.557 s IOW 557 ms Regards, Ralf