Re: advice on xruns
Holger Marzen <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Jul 2019 11:19:03 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jackit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 10:32 +0200, Holger Marzen wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 08:40:07 +0200 (CEST), Holger Marzen wrote: > > > > "nohz=off threadirqs noibrs noibpb nopti > > > > nospectre_v2 nospectre_v1 l1tf=off nospec_store_bypass_disable > > > > no_stf_barrier mds=off mitigations=off quiet splash" > > > > > > With those spectre mitigations turned off, it still might be of value > > > to disable audit, see > > > https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2018-September/045580.html. > > > > Can I disable it on the kernel command line if it's compiled in the kernel? > > I don't know what exactly the kernel parameter 'audit=0' does, perhaps > it does the job. I also don't know if disabling the spectre mitigations > for newer kernels, provides a faster path when disabling audit, let > alone that I'm not sure that even on an old machine without meltdown and > spectre mitigations, but an old kernel with CONFIG_AUDIT disabled, has > got noticeable impact on audio performance. I just build my old kernels > with disabling it by the kernel config. FWIW those using snaps should > consider to keep audit enabled: With audit=0 I can use a buffer size of 12 at 48000 Hz and 2 buffers to Play a mixcloud song with Firefox -> Pulseaudio -> jackd and get no xruns. Of course that is no real life scenario since a DAW and its plugins demand a much bigger buffer sizem depending on te number of tracks and plugins.