Re: Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback

Jan Depner <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel,gmane.linux.audio.users
Message-ID <1112112966.25938.54.camel@eviltwin>
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 09:11, R Parker wrote:

> And what problem does six parametric bands solve
> during mastering? Same qustion for more compression
> bands. If your audio is so screwed up to require that
> type of toolset then shit can it and start over.
> Seriously, you don't have a mastering problem you have
> recording and mixing problems.
> 

    Wait now, you're the one that thought it would be a good idea to add
meterbridge to JAMin.  You just posted that yesterday.  Actually, when I
use JAMin I often find myself needing just one more parametric EQ. 
Granted, I can draw any curve I want and get the same effect but I can't
slide it to exactly the right place.  There are still a couple of
features that would be nice in JAMin.  Direct out to .wav files has been
mentioned a number of times.  In fact I think you're one of the
proponents of that.  Steve wants to add warning lights for DC offset. 
I'd like to have small delays available for low and mid band.  It's
still a mastering tool and we haven't added anything that is not useful
for mastering.

Jan




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.