Re: Room correction (Was Progress?)
John Rigg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 03:18:44PM +0100, Daniel James wrote: > I've just this week bought a whole bunch of new patch cables so I can do > an A-B mixdown comparison between Ardour's mix buss and my old Seck > 8-buss analogue desk. It might have to be a blindfold test to make sure :-) I don't think you'll need the blindfold. I still have an old 12-channel Seck lying around, and last time I tried it I noticed it was noisy as hell compared with a more modern desk. I've no doubt it distorts more and has a narrower frequency response too. My current preferred way of mixing is to use an analog desk with outboard FX and compression, and mix back to a stereo track in Ardour. This keeps CPU load to a minimum, and allows me to adjust things _right now_ instead of clicking the correct window into focus, scrolling to the right place and fiddling around with a mouse. It's nice to be able to submix in Ardour when extra tracks are required, and the editing facilities are indispensable, so it's a powerful combination. Once the mix is done I can fire up Jamin and process it (I prefer to mix and master separately). I think the analog vs digital argument is irrelevant here, it's a matter of convenience. Low-end analog and digital both sound crap, and at the high-end both sound good. John