Re: another 64-bit issue?
Udo van den Heuvel <[email protected]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:09:19 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steve Harris wrote: >>> So, a "export LADSPA_PATH=/usr/lib64/ladspa" should do the trick. >> >> Thanks for the info. >> Would a patch to add the /usr/lib64/ladspa path to the default search >> path be acceptable? > > It might not be the best idea because > "/usr/local/lib/ladspa:/usr/lib/ladspa" is what LADSPA says the default > should be, it's probably more mysterious to users if some apps work and > some don't. So on 64-bit archs the ladspa libs should go in /usr/lib/ladspa? Or maybe: what harm could be done if /usr/lib64/ladspa was added to the end of the path? On 32-bit the lib64 dir would not exist so no harm done. On 64-bit the 32-bit locations would go first but the lib64 location would be found later. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/