Re: Feature Request JAMin
"Patrick Shirkey" <[email protected]> Wed, 6 Feb 2013 02:02:01 +1100 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.jamin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, February 6, 2013 1:29 am, Michiel Broek wrote: > On 02/05/2013 12:37 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote: >> On Tue, February 5, 2013 7:27 am, Michiel Broek wrote: >>> On 02/04/2013 05:31 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote: >>>>> I see it like this. A unit for live sound is adjusted once for the >>>>> combination of speaker units and amplifiers. Then only minor teaks >>>>> may >>>>> be needed for certain halls, but in most cases it's not necessary. >>>>> If >>>>> all is adjusted, lock the unit and bury the password. There is a >>>>> reason >>>>> why these DSP's have so few knobs. >>>>> >>>>> Mastering is different, each song is different and even the same song >>>>> can be made different just by tuning Jamin. Jamin does a good job and >>>>> works well combined with Ardour. >>>>> >>>>> I see it as two whole different things even if a lot of processing is >>>>> the same. >>>>> >>>>>>> But if someone would decide to go ahead building a solution for >>>>>>> live >>>>>>> sound, then I would like to see that happen in a fork of Jamin >>>>>>> instead >>>>>>> of trying to build all in one application. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I don't understand why you would request a fork. Jamin hasn't >>>>>> changed >>>>>> for >>>>>> several years so making some additions is hardly a big deal. If you >>>>>> wanted >>>>>> to continue using the older interface there could even be a >>>>>> "classic" >>>>>> interface for people with that specific need. >>>>>> >>>>>> Multiple interfaces for multiple uses. Jamin as a mastering tool for >>>>>> live >>>>>> and post prod. Makes sense to me to have it all in one place. A >>>>>> flexible >>>>>> and highly customisable solution for audio quality. The sound >>>>>> engineers >>>>>> best friend on or off stage... >>>>> I guess if I would design a software DSP based on Jamin technology, I >>>>> still would like it to be so that no one passing by that computer can >>>>> change any setting. It's just needed once and is mostly stacked away >>>>> in >>>>> the amp racks too, so it's not in range of the FOH mixer. >>>>> >>>> In order to achieve something like this with jamin we need a daemon >>>> mode. >>>> There is one thing in the way of that at the moment. It also affects >>>> the >>>> "presets" ui mode (-g). Basically the hdeq requires to be realized at >>>> least once before everything will work as expected. The hack is to >>>> realize the main window then hide it but in daemon mode we don't want >>>> to >>>> realize any windows. >>>> >>>> Jan do you have any tips on how to bypass "realizing" the hdeq. I >>>> notice >>>> we have the heq_pixmap for offscreen drawable so it looks like we are >>>> pretty close already. >>> Based on these ideas I would suggest to split it in two parts. The >>> daemon that does the processing and listens on a network socket for a >>> controlling app. >>> Build the controller app and let in communicate over the network. Then >>> you have the full freedom to install everything on one machine, or run >>> headless, or run remote controlled. For local use, use named sockets >>> only. >>> >> We already have osc support so we might not need a new socket. I think >> we >> can add a flag for remote controlling the daemon via the existing >> interface. >> >> I'm not completely across OSC though so if anyone has a suggestion for >> the >> best way to handle it functionally please let me know. >> >> FYI, I have managed to get past the issue of "realizing" the hdeq >> widget. >> Turns out that the update_meters() function was the culprit. >> >> I'm looking at the Daemon mode now and then I will make an update to cvs >> for others to test out... >> > Patrick, for some ideas about live units, > http://www.dbxpro.com/en-US/product_families/driverack > The building blocks in Jamin are there, but I think you need a lot of > configuration options to get to one of these dbx units. > What would you say we are missing at the moment that is the most obvious feature to include in a live processing unit? -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb