Re[4]: III_requantize() accuracy

"Grigory A." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.mad.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Tony,

Friday, March 26, 2004, 2:53:52 PM, you wrote:
TF>  With 16 bit implementation on TI55x how much accuracy you
TF> got? And how much accuracy improvement was there by changing the
TF> multiplication into 4.28 by 1.31 instead of 4.28 by 4.28 used in
TF> MAD decoder?

According to
http://www.underbit.com/resources/mpeg/audio/compliance/

in best case limited accuracy is achieved.
But in worst case ... rms still C*10^-4 but C - is bigger than limited
accuracy require.

4.28x1.31 - I just have to use this one :) This is 3DSP hardware
dependent - in another case - like 4.28x4.28 I need to do additional
actions... So almost in all places decoder use constants less than 1.0
Only in synthesis part some of them are bigger than 1.
But now I am working under synthesis and I am looking in way where
constant which are bigger than 1 will be split on 2 part.

After I finish decoder we can measure accuracy :).

-- 
Best regards,
 Grigory                            mailto:[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.