Re: MAD library for TI-54X DSPs

"balaji shanmugam" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.mad.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi
I too have started doing most of the stuffs in asm rather than going for C 
functions. The first thing that I am concentrating is the SYNTH function.

Bt still since i am following the LONG calculation(Q28.4) instead of Q15.1, 
mine is still vulnerable for timing issues.  It will be gr8 help if you 
could send me across your version (16 bit arithmetic and Q15.1 for 55X) of 
MAD decoder for my reference.

Thanks in advance
Balaji Shanmugam


>From: "Grigory A." <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: "Grigory A." <[email protected]>
>To: "balaji shanmugam" <[email protected]>
>CC: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [mad-dev] MAD library for TI-54X DSPs
>Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:58:50 +0900
>
>Hi Balaji!
>
>I have ported MAD to TI-55xx. I used Q1.15 format and 16 bits
>arithmetics for all calculation. As result of this is:
>
>limited accuracy ISO/IEC 11172-3 audio decoder
>
>according to
>http://www.underbit.com/resources/mpeg/audio/compliance/
>
>Yes - synthesis step of decoding is most calculation intensive part.
>I've used a little different method to port MAD to TI-55xx DSP -
>instead of providing "arithmetics macro" for given platform I've
>rewrite on DSP asm all calculation intensive functions (8 or 9 ?). So
>I think this is a better way in case if someone need close to optimal
>implementation for given hardware platform. Only you need to do is
>to rewrite these asm functions for your platform.
>
>I can send you my implementation of decoder. And maybe it is better to put 
>it to
>MAD site? Because I've sent it several times before to other people
>and this question is arisen again and again :). In additional I have
>same style implementation of MAD for sp3R5m DSP (www.3dsp.com) this
>one is 32 DSP core and in this case "fully compliant" decoder is
>obtained.
>
>
>
>Tuesday, July 20, 2004, 11:25:28 PM, you wrote:
>
>bs> Hi
>bs> I am trying to port the MAD library for the TI-54X DSP and running into
>bs> tight timing issues. When analysed, I found out that the 54X DSP takes 
>more
>bs> instructions to perform LONG calculations at the SYNTHESIS FILTER Bank 
>stage
>bs> as it is a 16 bit processor [but with a 40 bit accumulator]. As it is
>bs> required to perform 72 times the DCT32 and the remaining MATRIX 
>calculations
>bs> at the SYNTH stage, I like to optimize the synthesis filter bank.
>bs> I am not sure about using the Q28.4 format being used by MAD. Is there
>bs> anyway we can use the Q15.1 format for the calculations?
>bs> I like to know is there any hints or clues for the LONG calculations 
>that I
>bs> can make use of during my 54X porting phase. Also any thought about 
>using
>bs> the NORM instruction to round the final samples to 16 bit will be 
>helpful.
>
>bs> Regards
>bs> Balaji Shanmugam
>
>bs> _________________________________________________________________
>bs> Marriage?
>bs> http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?74 Join
>bs> BharatMatrimony.com for free.
>
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>  Grigory                            mailto:[email protected]
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get head-hunted by 10,000 recruiters.  http://go.msnserver.com/IN/46246.asp 
Post your CV on naukri.com today.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.