Re: conversion from low to high

I dont think so.... resampling from 96 to 44.1 would throw away samples, so
it would not make much of a difference compared to if the original samples
were at 44.1 to beging with.

On 7/31/06, Marty Huntzberry <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if by using the following:
>
> lame -b 128 --resample 44.1 low.wav high.mp3
>
> if a 96 kbits stream audiodumped to low.wav by mplayer would actually be a
> higher quality and better sounding mp3 (high.mp3) that would have 128
> kbits?
>
> Marty
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mp3encoder mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
>