Re: Unofficial git mirror of the CVS repo of py-lame
Andres Mejia <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPM41nOCVzvZ22co7DpjSXY926nJoOwqamqCFoskfDCf9HYM_Q@mail.gmail.com> |
2012/2/10 Rogério Brito <[email protected]>: > Hi, Andres and others. > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 19:37, Andres Mejia <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2012/2/10 Rogério Brito <[email protected]>: >>> I tried to preserve all names to give proper credit. If there is >>> anybody that intends to use it or if there is any mistake in the >>> conversion, please let me know. >> >> Speaking of git, did you ever resolve the issue where 'master' was not >> the mainline branch? > > I didn't try. Should I? I fear that I would break everybody who is > grabbing what I have. OTOH, I could just try to fix that and, > possibly, have that be the a tentative new migration plan for LAME, > but I remember that Robert seemed to prefer SVN. Yes, you should fix your repo. I wouldn't worry about people that may have cloned your repo. Chances are they think your repo is broken anyway and/or they know to use the cvs repo if they want to do any kind of development with lame. As a side note, libarchive just recently migrated to git from svn. There are a number of things that were done to migrate, such as rewriting history to change the Author field to use "Full name <email_address>" instead of just the username, append the cvs revision at the end of each commit message, seperate out branches that weren't actually branched from the mainline code, and a whole list of other things. There were a few times we had to do a force push in order to get the git migration done right, but in our case, it was preferable to have proper git repositories. Thus we intentionally force pushed or outright replaced the repo until it was done properly. > Robert, is that still the case? > > Andres, the new point release will contain at least one patch of > yours. The others seem to be material for LAME 3.100. If you have any > other patches, please, let me know which ones and I will apply them. Would they be the gtk1 and debian-as-extra-dist patches? These are the ones that should at least be applied in the new point release, especially the gtk1 patch since I can't imagine there are very many systems left that still contain gtk1. > Regards, > > > -- > Rogério Brito : rbrito@{ime.usp.br,gmail.com} : GPG key 4096R/BCFCAAAA > http://rb.doesntexist.org : Packages for LaTeX : algorithms.berlios.de > DebianQA: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rbrito%40ime.usp.br -- ~ Andres ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/