[ lame-Bugs-3551484 ] Bad mono encoding when using the interleaved functions

SourceForge.net <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #3551484, was opened at 2012-07-29 11:28
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by 
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100290&aid=3551484&group_id=290

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Libraries
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: ortalz ()
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Bad mono encoding when using the interleaved functions

Initial Comment:
When using the interleaved functions  (such as lame_encode_buffer_interleaved) for encoding a mono stream, bad output is coming out. 
Further investigation lead to a problem in lame_encode_buffer_template. When cfg->channels_in == 1, it calls lame_copy_inbuffer(gfc, buffer_l, buffer_r, nsamples, pcm_type, aa, norm); The value of aa is set to 2 when called from the interleaved functions. The aa parameter is passed on to lame_copy_inbuffer and define the jump value when copying the buffer. Jump value of 2 for mono stream result in skipping each second sample and accessing data beyond the buffer boundaries.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100290&aid=3551484&group_id=290

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.