huge difference between low-pass 20.1 and 20.2kHz

Mike F <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I did several tests recently with a few audio samples ( mostly created by sox ) - the one I would like to talk about is a 19.3kHz tone @ 48kHz.
when I apply a 20.1kHz or lower low-pass filter, there is a ton of "noise" is the resulting mp3, if I do the same with 20.2kHz low-pass or higher, it is >>much closer<< to the original.
I used 'baudline' and "my ears" to compare the results.

This case applies to Lame 3.99.5 and 3.98 - did not perform any tests on other Lame releases. ( compared to number of vorbis, aac, flac encoding results without a single case that matched or was similar to Lame )


Lame opts used:

lame -V0 --lowpass 20.1 output.wav out_v0_lp20.1_99lame.mp3
lame -V0 --lowpass 20.2 output.wav out_v0_lp20.2_99lame.mp3

http://www.mediafire.com/download/m0c6kjk7svkth7d/sample.sox.48khz.19.3khz.wav

http://www.mediafire.com/download/r8ksklm74css9sy/out_v0_lp20.1_99lame.mp3
http://www.mediafire.com/download/dyanulb8gm9zdq0/out_v0_lp20.2_99lame.mp3


I posted also a thread at hydrogenaudio while waiting for authorization to post on this mailing list:

http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=102229

Thanks!

Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.