Packaging current lame CVS snapshot for Debian -- good or bad idea?
Fabian Greffrath <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear lame-devs, I am (one of the) maintainer(s) of the lame package in Debian: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lame We are currently packaging the latest stable release 3.99.5 and over time, we have added more and more patches to our package, most of them have already been applied in the lame CVS repository as well (thanks rbrito): http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-multimedia/lame.git/tree/debian/patches Now that Debian "jessie" has been released, I'd like to prepare a new Debian package for lame based on a current CVS snapshot, so I can get rid of most of the patches we currently apply. Do you know of any issues with the current state of the code in the repository or another reason why this might turn out as a bad idea? Is there anything that should keep me from packaging it? Anything I should know? Thank you very much already! Cheers, - Fabian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Lame-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lame-dev