Re: Packaging current lame CVS snapshot for Debian -- good or bad idea?
robert <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I was already thinking about to release 3.99.6, containing almost all fixes from the main branch. Current psy tunings are not ready for a beta release, there is more work needed to be done. Ciao Robert -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: [email protected] Datum: 11.05.2015 08:49 (GMT+01:00) An: Fabian Greffrath <[email protected]> Cc: Robert Hegemann <[email protected]>, [email protected] Betreff: Re: [Lame-dev] Packaging current lame CVS snapshot for Debian -- good or bad idea? ... Anyway, as I have already talked privately with Fabian, I think that the best person to answer about packaging a snapshot of LAME would be Robert (in CC), since he has some patches fine-tuning the audio parts of the project. Robert, is generating a package from the current HEAD/master branch of CVS likely to have negative effects in comparison with lame 3.99.5? If so, what if we released a small bug fix of 3.99, say, 3.99.6? This way, I think that we could address things that other people want and we would save people from patching their local copies of lame. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Lame-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lame-dev