Re: Packaging current lame CVS snapshot for Debian -- good or bad idea?
Fabian Greffrath <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2015, 19:15 -0300 schrieb Rogério Brito: > Yes, that's what I thought, but I also thought that it would be best to ask > here. If Robert is thinking the same things that I am thinking, the release > 3.99.6 would be essentially what you have in Debian, plus (perhaps?) a few > minor patches from other projects. PS: That would not only be the actual patches from Debian, i.e. the ones in debian/patches, but also (1) the demotion of the debian/ directory in the lame sources from a build target to an extra directory and (2) the inclusion of the GTK+ autoconf directives. Both are currently patched directly into the Debian source tarball. Thanks! Fabian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ Lame-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lame-dev