Re: lame main branch

Am .08.2017, 14:47 Uhr, schrieb Elio Blanca via Lame-dev <[email protected]>:

>
> Great news,
> I just got the source code from CVS and I started a test session.
>
> Now, I'm going to encode some PCM content in order to compare the "official" 3.99.5 produced
> bitstream and this new "reverted to 3.99.5" psycho acoustic model (aka 3.100 beta 0).
>
> Which is the ideal setup for this to be effective?
> In a couple of preliminary tests, I see the resulting bitstreams are different (I had 48, 44.1 and
> 32 kHz content).
> Any suggestion?

The LAME version is written into the mp3 data, as you maybe know.
Well, change the version back to 3.99.5 release, then it's easier to make
binary comparisons. Effectively unchanging this change:

http://lame.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/lame/lame/libmp3lame/version.h?r1=1.140&r2=1.141&sortby=date


> Elio

Ciao Robert

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot