Re: Testers needed for current SVN version of LAME
Thomas Orgis via Lame-dev <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:12:53 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.mp3.lame |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20200830141253.1df77c9d@plasteblaster> |
Am Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:28:18 +0100 schrieb John Edwards via Lame-dev <[email protected]>: > It functions perfectly well except that the output wave file is 1152 > samples shorter than it should be on my test file. The "skipping > initial" and "skipping final" messages are the same but "Frame# " shows > "9782/9782 32 kbps MS" with libmpg123 and "9784/9784 32 kbps MS" > with the standard mpglib compile. Could it be that libmpg123 parses the Info frame, for example? I am actually not sure right now which metadata processing the mpglib fork does, as I was only occupied with replacing it;-) You should compare with your initial uncompressed file for which output is more appropriate. I'd expect just some added silence missing. Alrighty then, Thomas _______________________________________________ Lame-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lame-dev