Re: Replacing MPC SV8 framing with a stripped down matroska 'elementary' file ?

> - although many people are using MPC, he didnt get any valuable input
> from other devs ( apart from Case ) about his proposed specs changes for
> the SV8 framing. I guess robux4 can confirm, nothing is more
> demotivating for a developer who invested quite a lot of time into
> making a clear, readable specs page ( me is reminded about transor API
> ), and getting no feedback at all.

Well, I think Frank managed to work (almost) alone so far so he can manage
to do it. For sure there's less fun. But the real fun is when people use
your tool.

IMO, only Frank can tell if he still wants (or does) work on MPC and why.
There can be so many reasons to do it or not to do it.

> I am turning to you guys, and i know you have all hands full of work, to
> take a short timeout from current matroska development and have a look
> at the SV8 specs as linked above. matroska gets a lot of motivating
> cheers from all sides currently and its fun to work under these
> conditions, but we should not forget that it was Frank who helped a lot
> to define the basic EBML structure these days, by brainstorming together
> with Steve about how a good container should look alike.

I'd like to, but I'm not going to make any promises, as I failed to really
be helpful to Frank so far.

http://mpc.corecodec.org