Re: GSoC 2014: Solr search

Wieland Hoffmann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hallo Paul Taylor:
> On 26/03/2014 16:39, Wieland Hoffmann wrote:
> > Hallo Paul Taylor:
> >>> With Solr, you'd just have to change a config file and add a test case,
> >>> which is imho an easier task for most people than digging into a large
> >>> codebase in any language.
> >> You still need to write the test ectera so I don't see it gains you any
> >> simplicity. But my key point was not Solr versus non_solr but the work
> >> involved in creating new test cases rather than building on the existing
> >> ones.
> > I haven't planned anything in that direction, so I can't promise a good
> > or bad experience.
> >
> Heh, exactly my point - nobody likes doing unit tests so they tend not 
> to get done as evidenced by the fact you havent planned anything in that 
> direction, I can only consider a lack of tests a bad experience.

No, I do not have anything planned in the direction of writing unit
tests for the analysis part (which is what the last few mails of this
conversation were about) because it's not the focus of this GSoC project
- I'm pretty sure you won't be the only one who's going to be pretty
angry with me if I don't write tests for the stuff that is the focus :-)

-- 
Wieland
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.