Re: Data Import Policy
"Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen" <[email protected]> Tue, 12 May 2015 16:40:25 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --===============1809604175== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aajgbnEoqUk3nHt7CdpPAvCWstcSq9IG6" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --aajgbnEoqUk3nHt7CdpPAvCWstcSq9IG6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Den 12-05-2015 kl. 16:00 skrev Andre Wiethoff: >> This should not be a relationship like we currently have relationships= =2E >> This is an entirely subjective piece of information and some people wi= ll >> consider two artists similar while others will not. > Yes, therefore I did propose to not open it for public editing, but=20 > having it "computer generated" only (by whatever means, be it web=20 > crawling or clustering on large data sets). But you proposed it to be stored as a relationship like the current relationships in the MusicBrainz database=E2=80=A6 (read below) > But in the end you agree that the result of such a web crawl/clustering= =20 > algorithm/whatever should be stored in the database as final result (fo= r=20 > speedier access of the results) - if implemented at all? But perhaps we= =20 > should discuss at first whether the new data would be beneficial for th= e=20 > users (or the database)... In *a* db, sure, in *the* (MB) db, no. It is not objective data and it would not be user generated. It would be far more reasonable to place it in another (sub)project. See e.g., AcousticBrainz and CritiqueBrainz for two MetaBrainz projects expanding on the MusicBrainz data without being inserted directly into the MB site/data themselves. A RecommendationBrainz or SimilarityBrainz (or, heck, maybe it could be part of CritiqueBrainz?) would be a better fit for this. (Also note that having it in a separate project does not mean it cannot be used by/on MusicBrainz; e.g., CritiqueBrainz reviews are pulled in for relevant MB release( group)s.) >> There are already >> projects (though I forget which, sorry) that group/cluster entities >> based on relationships (which IIRC wasn't completely off), so it is >> possible to do something like it with the data in MB already. > I wonder which relationships have been used to group/cluster the=20 > entities? [=E2=80=A6] IIRC, all the relationships. The more times two entities linked to each other, the closer those two entities were. AFAIK, it's a fairly simple heuristic, but given the amount of relationships in the MB db, it should give reasonable results for most fairly well known artists. >> There's >> also AcousticBrainz which can be used to cluster entities based on the= >> acoustic properties of their recordings. > I don't think that clustering regarding the acoustic properties will=20 > bring any good results for now, I guess this will still take ten years = > until there exist something that produces results matchable to a human = > expert (or even advanced amateur)... I wouldn't make it stand on its own, no. ABz is still very much in its infancy and the tools and algorithms in Essentia are not yet up to par with this massive 2+ million song dataset currently available in the ABz database. However, ABz can give you ranges about whether a group does mostly vocal or instrumental things, whether they're mostly high or low BPM, whether they have a predominant mood, etc. These aren't necessarily 100% accurate, but combining similarity on these values with relationship clustering, I think it may be possible to get some interesting results (e.g., two artists with a lot of relationships connecting them that additionally does mostly acoustic, instrumental happy+relaxed music are likely more similar than two artists with no relationships connecting them and one doing mostly instrumental and the other doing mostly vocal stuff). When/if we get access to scrobbles, that's a third data source that can be added to the mix, but I really do not think we need it to get started on a similarity/recommendation engine. --=20 Namast=C3=A9, Frederik =E2=80=9CFreso=E2=80=9D S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/> MB: https://musicbrainz.org/user/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Freso --aajgbnEoqUk3nHt7CdpPAvCWstcSq9IG6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVUhDZAAoJECdijq9dwUA+0QkP/j5BTNOW75F6l9MTlij6KOHL 2CxRCNIWG4CrdPqxYwbQ61CW7BhHYxbCiVsxI4hak4TMf3LR5vzz/w1Sw7iAf+81 +OS44JeXsvd1M/d7OEm8hqrgupLmUcoxi0n62Ipyj3ZKhtyrPSGORT9546ctM1Jd Vbxom6H0PxUSbXI1vvPCFT4AeUPglObDgl0P2dcJH1aRWeXYOAzHWfNcl6DzDSCa QegYT/PX24HHw3hfeN0l7BZCm8aWoITRYOfr5bG3HWibNg/Uq/wL6sqoKQV2HYp8 SJLljdKUj2BqV55Q2GQKuDRajsCPdNuyKkKJfLYbRC9qCTt0A9JleRX03mAcovG3 /KOQomISCvxKCr7Ep3WsXjl2BEouuoxHx+fpplxj89hOkhakvK6LvBfrZv/BbRjg /r2xohJdIC4v9p1io6KdzBgahObtiT0NopkTb/n2yzIZRvQFWZVIHh3iThHO3Kni 5ABvNORPcvWcQ5rAMmdUzIfMkEbJTCvkr7yEu8SGi8xAgUT1cFRhbUhk+fac/wjt SdJLiAReGs0p5TF43OU9uliCrcnzrwLGu1e1CCO1xkkvnsRBG3QdYsRVF0JBbtpZ qgqBlLl8Z7v5NhG6Fvt+w7CONxvIFsuAT3NIVHRA0NEvuTyUVS2SMVqgsedmanFH oN3qntcLiwkS5OPc55OJ =MQAw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aajgbnEoqUk3nHt7CdpPAvCWstcSq9IG6-- --===============1809604175== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-devel --===============1809604175==--