Re: [mb-users] Rare transcriptions

On 10/02/2012 03:05 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
> I am always annoyed by this kind of edit: this is not a recording of Clair
> de lune but of a transcription of it. IMO this edit is currently valid,
> because there is no other way to enter it. I know we decided we shouldn't
> create a new work for each transcription, and I agree that in cases such as
> this one it would be overkill and it would clutter the database with Works
> with only one Recording. But wouldn't adding a "transcription" attribute to
> the Recording-Work AR be a good idea?

I would say they should be separate works, and we should improve our
display of related works.

I just ran into BWV 645 which is a transcription for organ of BWV 140 so
obviously the traditional catalogs do this at least in some cases.

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQa127AAoJEDH4iLg9EM+qLIcH/1K5X0kC7UKMyE0dasBiFfMh
Xz9u4KxDm3h409UjbAzj5gklYvQCPglqUNNIwaavk0hgkhTtOftULdYs7CRcRttg
3mTxfMVMx2We4exm/IQBTUWleZs1bHwgEJOPjgw8ar0B2Ex5mNZeNfBccHRHzx/W
py1UcSEFDxdP1AvWHmg1valCnQWMg9VtmvtxhhdaAjQnRfPy/6ZJVL+Exhncymw8
FIAKXa24qFRIr63J0LEjze1NdmQf+V4NE4PYSV/p1G/qx4FQuQp6NJQWZvo9qsEB
0NsVH06HJl/8q7Vlx7+3Q9pgCk9cd3GRXMXNW0uBlJ41/Q79EDYs0efZqcxd0Uo=
=4d2H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----