Re: [mb-users] Are different digital downloads different releases?
Davi Figueiredo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACGGrhVxYqKz0mUBnsc+J5a0ezJL9s0g-RqBakLmS7bpDi68SA@mail.gmail.com> |
2013/1/2 Kuno Woudt <[email protected]> > > (Again, I'm only saying that digital releases should be kept seperate > when there are actual differences between them -- different cover art, > or different audio, digital booklet included or not, stuff like that). > Most digital releases get encoded from the same source; there are even services <http://www.tunecore.com/index/how_it_works> which allow the artist to upload the content once and have it submitted to several services simultaneously, and stores which let you download the release you bought in multiple formats. The encoding is generally an automated process and can change at any time even inside the same store (think of when iTunes started offering 256kbps "plus" files instead of the previous 128kbps ones and reencoded all the releases). Even the artwork can change over time: iTunes previously offered 600x600 covers, but now has 1200x1200 versions; eMusic once had only tiny cover thumbnails, then started offering huge 1400x1400px images, then they recompressed those images to make them smaller without changing the resolution, and now only offers 600x600 ones. Should each of these changes trigger a different release? For physical releases, we generally consider different pressings of the same release to be a single entity, even though there can be minor differences in the disc (such as a few more sectors in the last track, which results in a different disc ID) or artwork (one pressing can have more faded colors than another, or a different "pressing number" as is common in Brazilian releases). It seems to me that we already use an ArtistIntent-like approach for them, and only consider releases as different when it was actually the artist's or label's intention to make them different; we should do the same for digital releases. If the album in one service has a digital booklet which is not available on the others, or the artwork is actually different (as opposed to being simply resized, recompressed or slightly cropped to each service's standards), or it has been mastered differently (such as the "Mastered for iTunes" releases), or has a different label than another, then a new release is justified, but not simply encoding differences. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users