Re: [mb-users] Are different digital downloads different releases?

Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user
Message-ID <CANe_y9QJ5gP8ivi1v8Zj00NotWpRA358ufJMkawxhV+7uAnmBQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013/1/9 lixobix <[email protected]>

> 1. We definitely need digital releases. Some releases are only released
> digitally.
>
> 2. I am of the opinion that, in general, there should be only one digital
> release, except in the following circumstances:
>
> a) A retailer has a version with a different track list, contains a digital
> booklet, or offers some other form of extra material, e.g. iTunes or Amazon
> releases with 'exclusive tracks'. This includes when a retailer offers two
> different versions e.g. 'standard' and 'deluxe', with extra tracks.
>
> These two are separate releases:
> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-whole-love/id450974480,
> https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-whole-love-deluxe-version/id450974533
>
> OR
>
> b) The release is available in two or more of the following formats: Lossy
> (any codec), standard lossless (16 bit 44.1 khz), hi-res lossless (>16 bit
> 44.1 khz). In such cases, retailers clearly sell two or more different
> things: Lossy, lossless, hi-res lossless, CD, and vinyl are almost always
> listed as separate items, at different prices. In such cases, a single MB
> release would have to link to more than one item, with different prices,
> for
> sale by one retailer. This would fly in the face of the notion of unique
> releases.
>
>
> https://bleep.com/release/40685-rush-hour-presents-rush-hour-recordings-best-of-2012
> would have a lossy and lossless release
>
> https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/a-love-supreme/id485525345 and
>
> https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=catalogdetail&valbum_code=HD00602498010921
> would be separate releases, as the former is lossy, and the latter is
> hi-res
> lossless. Note the significant difference in price.
>
> All lossy codecs are treated as equal by retailers who offer a choice, so
> they do not amount to separate releases. The same goes for the choice of
> wav, flac etc. for lossless.
>

Yes, this seems a good compromise. This would create at most 3 digital
releases for the same track listing.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.