Re: [mb-users] Are different digital downloads different releases?
Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANe_y9QJ5gP8ivi1v8Zj00NotWpRA358ufJMkawxhV+7uAnmBQ@mail.gmail.com> |
2013/1/9 lixobix <[email protected]> > 1. We definitely need digital releases. Some releases are only released > digitally. > > 2. I am of the opinion that, in general, there should be only one digital > release, except in the following circumstances: > > a) A retailer has a version with a different track list, contains a digital > booklet, or offers some other form of extra material, e.g. iTunes or Amazon > releases with 'exclusive tracks'. This includes when a retailer offers two > different versions e.g. 'standard' and 'deluxe', with extra tracks. > > These two are separate releases: > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-whole-love/id450974480, > https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/the-whole-love-deluxe-version/id450974533 > > OR > > b) The release is available in two or more of the following formats: Lossy > (any codec), standard lossless (16 bit 44.1 khz), hi-res lossless (>16 bit > 44.1 khz). In such cases, retailers clearly sell two or more different > things: Lossy, lossless, hi-res lossless, CD, and vinyl are almost always > listed as separate items, at different prices. In such cases, a single MB > release would have to link to more than one item, with different prices, > for > sale by one retailer. This would fly in the face of the notion of unique > releases. > > > https://bleep.com/release/40685-rush-hour-presents-rush-hour-recordings-best-of-2012 > would have a lossy and lossless release > > https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/a-love-supreme/id485525345 and > > https://www.hdtracks.com/index.php?file=catalogdetail&valbum_code=HD00602498010921 > would be separate releases, as the former is lossy, and the latter is > hi-res > lossless. Note the significant difference in price. > > All lossy codecs are treated as equal by retailers who offer a choice, so > they do not amount to separate releases. The same goes for the choice of > wav, flac etc. for lossless. > Yes, this seems a good compromise. This would create at most 3 digital releases for the same track listing. -- Frederic Da Vitoria (davitof) Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - http://www.april.org _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users