[mb-users] Remixes and recording-of relationships
David Gasaway <[email protected]> Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:36:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGsJ5AVQd0n8YvVTfLi+9br-NWRqxB2A8uvDPtGWZTP4RJ9bww@mail.gmail.com> |
I'm working on a release with some remixes (which I don't usually work with much), and could use some insight. I added some relationships like this: (1) <remix recording a><remix of><recording b> (2) <recording b><recording of><work c> I'm finding that with this setup, the UI doesn't show songwriting information and picard doesn't even write a work id tag. Some other remixes on the release had a pre-existing AR: (3) <remix recording a><recording of><work c> This solves the UI/picard problems, but after I added (1), (2) and (3) seem redundant. Is it normal to have both (1) and (3) on a remix? If not, I'll think about adding Picard/MBS tickets. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users