Re: [mb-users] Remixes and recording-of relationships

David Gasaway <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:34 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user
Message-ID <CAGsJ5AUkLW7gcXXJjT2m52eRWSkqJo6OfwyF2HTVRR1FhtrVOQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <
[email protected]> wrote:


> It is. We don't have inheritance pretty much anywhere, since it's hard to
> get right -  not all remixes are recordings of the same work for example.
>

Hmm.  Seems like you would use "contains samples" or "mash-up" in those
cases.  Or it would be so different that you'd create a different work
related by "basis for".  I see your point with inheritance, but I wasn't
looking for inheritance, necessarily.  Currently, MBS will show something
like:
<track>
   recording of: <work>
      composer: <artist>

I'd be looking for something like:
<track>
   remix of: <recording>
      recording of: <work>
         composer: <artist>

Then again, if the practice is to add the recording-work AR, no changes are
necessary.

-- 
-:-:- David K. Gasaway
-:-:- Email: [email protected]

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users