Re: [mb-users] Remixes and recording-of relationships
David Gasaway <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:10:34 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGsJ5AUkLW7gcXXJjT2m52eRWSkqJo6OfwyF2HTVRR1FhtrVOQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < [email protected]> wrote: > It is. We don't have inheritance pretty much anywhere, since it's hard to > get right - not all remixes are recordings of the same work for example. > Hmm. Seems like you would use "contains samples" or "mash-up" in those cases. Or it would be so different that you'd create a different work related by "basis for". I see your point with inheritance, but I wasn't looking for inheritance, necessarily. Currently, MBS will show something like: <track> recording of: <work> composer: <artist> I'd be looking for something like: <track> remix of: <recording> recording of: <work> composer: <artist> Then again, if the practice is to add the recording-work AR, no changes are necessary. -- -:-:- David K. Gasaway -:-:- Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users