Re: [mb-users] Remixes and recording-of relationships
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:55:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHSHD+UH6BLhjqhtaToLp=L4CkursPRSQgrG5UF9C+szdvwkJw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:49 PM, David Gasaway <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> What I was thinking of is cases where a remix of a song involves an >> additional lyricist, requiring a new work. >> > > Okay. Since you say "additional lyrics", that means original lyricist > still applies. The works could be related ("basis of" seems the best > available option), but lyricist won't inherit. So, you'd have to either > apply the original songwriters to the new work, *or* relate the recording > to both works. Based on previous discussion, I'd guess the former option? > I'd just add two works, add all relationships that apply to each work (so, yes, add all the original artists to the new work as long as their participation still applies to it - that's how it's done in the industry too FWIW) and relate the recording to the new work. I'd also just link the two works with "version of" - at least for the case I'm thinking of which is hip hop 'remixes'. "based on" is intended for less direct relationships I'd say - "suite is based on ballet" or "opera is based on novel" or "pop song is based on Chopin piano piece". Anyway, in general, yes, add any relationship that applies to the recording to the actual recording (unless it is a work-level relationship of course, then add it to the actual work linked to the recording :) ) -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users