Re: [mb-users] Remixes and recording-of relationships

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:26 PM, David Gasaway <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:10 PM, David Gasaway <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>
>> As in "earliest version of"?  I don't even know how to apply that AR
>>> properly anymore.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, work-work "version of" is the standard way to link works if none of
>> the other more specialised options are a clear fit.
>>
>
> And how is the "earliest" bit supposed to be interpreted now?  The SG
> doesn't help much, because it's obsolete by its own admission.  Just by the
> text of the AR, it sounds like I should be following a chain of work-work
> ARs back to the original composition, but that doesn't seem right in the
> context of this discussion.
>

Heh, I didn't even remember that it still had the "earliest" word. I think
pretty much everyone has used it just to link versions directly, creating a
chain when needed (X is a version of Y which is a version of Z).
-- 
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users