Re: [mb-users] Long works and classical music: ideas for overcoming the track dominant approach

Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> Fri, 10 May 2013 13:50:55 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user
Message-ID <CAHSHD+WdnWdLwQbzu2uQQ_jKvXbVJGPDQ_BB0p8JFobDUn+U4Q@mail.gmail.com>
>
> (1) marking a set of recordings and work parts (however independently) as
> being a complete set of parts (recordings) that represent the work;
>
We do have a way of marking works as parts of the parent/full work already.


> (2) adding precedes/follows relationships between parts (similar to the
> track editor when adding a release;
>
Ordered parts for works is something we've certainly wanted for a while.
It's not technically trivial though, unless we did it by literally adding
"next in set" relationships, which can be a pain to maintain and are at
most a hack :) The ordering should probably be stored in the part-of
relationship, ideally (IMO) by this being an n-point relationship that
includes all parts instead of n "has part" relationships.



> (3) allow adding a directed sequence of movements to be associated to a
> recording (see my first example).
>
You can add several movements to one recording already - what's missing
there is the ordering.

-- 
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users