Re: [mb-users] Long works and classical music: ideas for overcoming the track dominant approach
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <[email protected]> Fri, 10 May 2013 13:50:55 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHSHD+WdnWdLwQbzu2uQQ_jKvXbVJGPDQ_BB0p8JFobDUn+U4Q@mail.gmail.com> |
> > (1) marking a set of recordings and work parts (however independently) as > being a complete set of parts (recordings) that represent the work; > We do have a way of marking works as parts of the parent/full work already. > (2) adding precedes/follows relationships between parts (similar to the > track editor when adding a release; > Ordered parts for works is something we've certainly wanted for a while. It's not technically trivial though, unless we did it by literally adding "next in set" relationships, which can be a pain to maintain and are at most a hack :) The ordering should probably be stored in the part-of relationship, ideally (IMO) by this being an n-point relationship that includes all parts instead of n "has part" relationships. > (3) allow adding a directed sequence of movements to be associated to a > recording (see my first example). > You can add several movements to one recording already - what's missing there is the ordering. -- Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users