Re: [mb-users] ARs for references in works?

2013/10/4 Per Starbäck <[email protected]>

> > I am starting to believe I am wrong. But about your last question, the
> last
> > link could need corroboration. Anybody could enter such a link based
> only on
> > the title similarity. What I was hoping for is some sort of proof that
> this
> > similarity is not accidental,
>
> Glad to hear! :-)
>
> Absolutely, but just in the edit note. As for other edits of course we
> shouldn't add stuff we're just guessing and we should be wary of edits
> without (relevant) edit notes.
>
> I admit the distinction between the needs of an editor and the needs
> of a user where only editors are interested in the edit notes isn't as
> clearcut as I made it out to be. When you use the database everything
> is served as facts, but clearly a suspicious user might want to see
> some references, and it would be good if that was easier to find.
>

Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind.



> To begin with the "Editing history" button is only present if you are
> logged in. That I don't like. Show editing histories for everyone! And
> even if you manage to press that to see what source was given for
> this, you have to scroll down through other edits. Ideally I would
> like an option for editing history for every fact as well, that gives
> only the relevant edits.
>

Agreed.

-- 
Frederic Da Vitoria
(davitof)

Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » -
http://www.april.org

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users