Re: [mb-users] Sorting sub-works and more generally ARs

Frederic Da Vitoria wrote
> Here is my suggestion: add a simple number to ARs which could be used by
> the AR types which we find relevant. This number would of course be used
> for ordering.

Unfortunately there's various places that wouldn't achieve what I want. It
won't work where the links aren't all to one entity or where there's
multiple sets of ordered links to one work. For example, with medleys, if
the performance is split over several recordings the numbering wouldn't
work. Alternatively, if there are two medleys on one recording again it
wouldn't work. 
I'd like to see an ordered list of relationships. However, if something like
that wouldn't be implemented for several years and the simple numbering
could be quickly then it'd be worth doing that as it would cover many cases. 



--
View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Sorting-sub-works-and-more-generally-ARs-tp4658906p4658931.html
Sent from the MusicBrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.