Re: [mb-users] Sorting sub-works and more generally ARs
Tom Crocker <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:11:31 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHmUbme=DCZvpPx1o1MvvN67qkxA5+F+i_Ojk82DcaOVKD_nFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 23 October 2013 09:50, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/10/23 Tom Crocker <[email protected]> >> >> [...] >> >> a) medley with recordings split into component works: >> The ARs are between >> recording - work >> a - x >> b - y >> c - z >> So there's nothing apart from perhaps some versions of a tracklist to tie >> them together. >> > > Interesting, I hadn't thought of that: in a Recording-Work AR, the > "parent" is the Recording. But that doesn't change anything IMO, simple > numbering would still work. > But simple numbering will not tell us that a-x is part of a medley with b-y and c-z and there is no robust way of knowing that based on the data we have. We could probably figure it out in most cases based on the ordering of tracks but that's complex, implicit and can't be guaranteed. We know x has been recorded as part of a medley, but not which the other works were. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users