Re: [mb-users] Sorting sub-works and more generally ARs

Maybe we could do work-work parts now & save medleys for later?


2013/10/23 Tom Crocker <[email protected]>

>
>
>
> On 23 October 2013 09:50, Frederic Da Vitoria <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> 2013/10/23 Tom Crocker <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>> a) medley with recordings split into component works:
>>> The ARs are between
>>> recording - work
>>> a - x
>>> b - y
>>> c - z
>>> So there's nothing apart from perhaps some versions of a tracklist to
>>> tie them together.
>>>
>>
>> Interesting, I hadn't thought of that: in a Recording-Work AR, the
>> "parent" is the Recording. But that doesn't change anything IMO, simple
>> numbering would still work.
>>
>
> But simple numbering will not tell us that a-x is part of a medley with
> b-y and c-z and there is no robust way of knowing that based on the data we
> have. We could probably figure it out in most cases based on the ordering
> of tracks but that's complex, implicit and can't be guaranteed. We know x
> has been recorded as part of a medley, but not which the other works were.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>



-- 

/symphonick

_______________________________________________
MusicBrainz-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users