Re: [mb-users] Should catalog numbers be capitalised?

Paul Taylor <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:35:36 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 20/09/2014 20:44, lixobix wrote:
> Per Starb=E4ck wrote
>>> Where possible, I'd prefer to use the form that the label uses in
>>> printed catalogs or on web pages over the form used on an individual
>>> release (assuming there's a difference).
>> Somewhat similar to that I also think it's sensible to normalize
>> according to how similar catalog numbers are written. That is instead
>> of a series of releases
>>
>>    XLP-101
>>    XLP-102
>>    xlp-103
>>    XLP 104
>>    XLP-105
>>
>> normalize to "XLP-103" (and "XLP-104"). I know that I several time
>> have chosen the catalog number that most conforms to other catalog
>> numbers like that, when there are several versions of the catalog
>> number printed, at least.
>>
Yes, definently

Paul