Re: [mb-users] Should catalog numbers be capitalised?
Paul Taylor <[email protected]> Sat, 20 Sep 2014 22:35:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/09/2014 20:44, lixobix wrote: > Per Starb=E4ck wrote >>> Where possible, I'd prefer to use the form that the label uses in >>> printed catalogs or on web pages over the form used on an individual >>> release (assuming there's a difference). >> Somewhat similar to that I also think it's sensible to normalize >> according to how similar catalog numbers are written. That is instead >> of a series of releases >> >> XLP-101 >> XLP-102 >> xlp-103 >> XLP 104 >> XLP-105 >> >> normalize to "XLP-103" (and "XLP-104"). I know that I several time >> have chosen the catalog number that most conforms to other catalog >> numbers like that, when there are several versions of the catalog >> number printed, at least. >> Yes, definently Paul