Re: [mb-users] Missing cover art type?
lixobix <[email protected]> Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.musicbrainz.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In that case the definition of booklet needs to be changed, but I don't see how booklet could be redefined as a single print on the reverse of the front or back cover. Why would inside be too vague? -- View this message in context: http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/Missing-cover-art-type-tp4668321p4668452.html Sent from the MusicBrainz - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.