Re: Netjuke-users digest, Vol 1 #395 - 15 msgs

I cannot recommend Jinzora myself, I tried the latest
release and I cannot get it to scan all of my music
(190 GB) of mp3s. It is also terribly slow compared to
Netjuke with only about 1/4 of the tracks in the DB
versus Netjuke.

I really like the interface, but it just doesn't cut
the mustard for true power-users/consumers.

> Subject: [Netjuke-users] A convert? [Fwd: Jinzora
> 2.0 released - upcoming merger with Netjuke]
> 
> Ok, I guess first impressions can be wrong.  After
> getting a bit of
> help from the jinzora developers to fix an
> incompatibility with
> Mandrake 10.1 (php issue, easy to fix)... I finally
> got a working
> Jinzora2 install that looks like netjuke for the
> most part.
> 
> I haven't tried editing any tracks yet, but I must
> say that I can
> learn to like this.  The multiple interfaces are
> nice, and it is
> configurable enough that I can turn off things I
> don't particularly
> care for (album art, for example :)
> 
> Anyways, if you guys are still on the fence, give
> Jinzora a try.  Use
> the netjuke skin and it looks almost  like netjuke
> 1.0rc2.  It even
> works!
> 
> It actually plenty fax on my 21500 song collection. 
> I still like how
> netjuke reads tags (slightly different than jinzora,
> probably the
> order of id3v1 vs id3v2) that I will have to edit
> some songs to have
> the same organization I had with netjuke, but that's
> minor.
> 
> Art
> 


We've all heard that a million monkeys banging on a million typewriters will eventually reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, we know this is not true.

[Robert Wilensky (1997), Oxford Dictionary of Modern Quotations (2002)]


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click