Re: MD Titling Problems

I think we may have gone a little off the topic of the question here. From 
what Gareth Milne wrote, I think his question is on track marks, not track 
titling, contrary to the subject of his email.

Are there any cheap sound cards that don't corrupt the SP/DIF output? I 
have an audigy at the moment, but I've read that it will change data 
headers on the output. I'm currently building a DAC, and I need the SP/DIF 
output to be as close to the reference specs as possible. Anyone got a 
recommendation for a card?

Keep up the good work

_____________________________________
Tom Adam
Broke Student ;)






At 20:27 05/04/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>On Saturday, Apr 5, 2003, at 19:30 Europe/London, Marcus Morbe wrote:
>>>Message: 1
>>>From: "Mirza Hujdur" <[email protected]>
>>>To: <[email protected]>
>>>Subject: Re: MD Titling Problems
>>>Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:46:22 +0200
>>>Reply-To: [email protected]
>>>
>>>Optical out doesnt transfer data (tracknames) in ANY ways.. you can do
>>>whatever you want, but it wont help you...
>
>>cd-players support tracknames ontheir spdif out,
>
>You sure about that?
>
>I know there's some differences in the standards for subcode data
>(eg between AES/SBU and SP/DIF) but I'm fairly sure neither can carry
>track names.
>
>As I understand it, CD-TEXT info is stored in the lead-in data (or is
>it lead-out) on the CD and can't be transfered via SP/DIF...
>
>Or to look at it another way, why would Sony sell a special
>cable to transfer track names ("Joint Text" or whatever they
>call it) if the data could be simply transferred via SP/DIF?
>
>Pete.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmd-dev mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://mail.monochromatic.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/netmd-dev