Re: Do we want LV2 and jack-midi?

chuck elliot <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.rosegarden.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi All,

Pipewire claims to be a replacement for both jack and pulseaudio and

provides drop-in replacements for programs that expect either to be

present. It also claims to be low-latency. My distro (Fedora) moved to

Pipewire a few updates ago and I hardly noticed. I usually route fluidsynth

through alsa so I haven't tried rg via Pipewire but I'll give the pulseaudio

drop-in a tryout. If, as it claims, pw is to be the standard Linux 
sound/media

server (it does video too), then I guess rg should have a good look at it...

I have no view on LV2.

Regards,

Chuck Elliot.


On 6/6/22 2:45 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As a new release approaches, I think one of the latest threads about 
> synths, jack (midi) etc. re-prompts the longstanding questions:
>
> 1. do we want LV2 in Rosegarden?
> 2. do we want Jack-MIDI?
>
> IMHO (and with an updated perspective compared to my opinions in the 
> past):
>
> 1. I think on the one hand this would be great because LV2 is the 
> current de-facto standard on Linux and would open up many 
> possibilities if integrated natively.
> The key question, though, is: would it make sense to support LV2 if 
> then user's aren't able to 'generate' (i.e. save as, say, a WAV file), 
> the final result of their musical masterpiece made in Rosegarden?
> I'm thinking of software like Ardour, Qtractor and LMMS (the latter 
> notably also not supporting LV2 yet), which are potentially 
> self-contained in that you add/use plugins, and when done export to a 
> final audio file.
> If Rosegarden were to support LV2 it should also support audio export 
> of the final result, otherwise it would mostly generate user frustration.
> Self-contained in audio is a double-edged sword which easy becomes 
> obsolete when relying on plugins which will eventually be 
> un-maintained or become incompatible (this applies also outside the 
> Linux ecosystem - think RTAS or DirectX).
>
> 2. jack-midi feels like a higher priority. Why? Because it would allow 
> to e.g. connect to jack-midi applications like Carla (multi-format 
> plugin host) or Ardour (to name a couple) and better support 
> modularity within the current Linux ecosystem where it seems that ALSA 
> Midi is considered to be deprecated. True there is a2j but that's 
> really a bit of a work-around.
>
> My two (user-oriented) cents and would be interesting to hear other 
> opinions.
>
>
> Lorenzo.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rosegarden-user mailing list
> Rosegarden-user-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org - use the link below to unsubscribe
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

-- 
New releases in the popular self-help series:
'Dressmaking for Dummies'
'Window Dressing for Dummies'
'Crash Testing for Dummies'
'Ventriloquism for Dummies'
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.