On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:45:34 -0400
[email protected] wrote:
> On Sunday, June 12, 2022 04:37:03 PM [email protected] wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Jun 2022 08:07:01 -0400
> > [email protected] wrote:
>
> > > Thinking about it -- I don't have a sig, I might make that my sig.
> > >
> > > I'm thinking about how to incorporate into it that very short videos (15
> > > to 60 seconds, with a minimum of "chatter" by the narrator / "host") can
> > > be useful in some cases. (Just tell me (either in written text or in
> > > the first 5 seconds what I should be seeing, then show me, maybe
> > > summarize or repeat in slow(er) motion.
>
> Just wanted to try this out, an early attempt at a sig -- I will probably
> continue to "wordsmith" it (I've made several variations already).
>
> Oh, I'm waiting for someone to ask about the Oxford comma -- when they do,
> I'll point out that one company lost $10M due to a missing Oxford comma (I can
> provide a link to that -- I don't know if the case has been appealed to the
> Supreme Court), and missing Oxford commas may lead to cannabalism (didn't look
> for a link to that one -- judicious googling may lead to the humorous examples
> (I assume none are true ;-) that involve someone getting eaten or such.
>
> --
> A picture (or sketch, diagram, or chart) is worth a thousand words -- divide
> by 10 for each minute of (or audio) -- or, where feasible, create a transcript
> and edit it to 10% of the original! (Oxford comma included in this sig at no
> charge.)
Good luck, the concept is not easy to signaturize :-)
You can have as many sigs as you like BTW and keep rotating them, or even QUOTE others'.
--
Few people really understand why the hindlick maneuver just plain works.
--
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.