Posting etiquette (Was Re: SysEx banks? - Errata)

Andrew S <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.rosegarden.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> On 09/07/2022 10:58 AM EDT [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> This is the beginning of what I see in a text only client -- didn't bother to
> copy the whole thing...

I will be sticking to plain text then.  Wasn't sure before, if formatted text has become acceptable here. 
 
> If you reply: snip, snip, and snip again; leave attributions; avoid HTML;

Good idea.  I was previously concerned about including more context for potential newcomer readers... But I guess one can always read previous messages in the thread -- that's what threads are for (to the tune of "..that's what friends are for")

> avoid top posting; and keep it "on list". (Oxford comma included at no

I used to religiously quote and post at the bottom (avoid top posting).  But then landed in a corporate environment where all of the (hundreds) of my coworkers had **absolutely no clue** about bottom posting, and had no notion of "top posting" and why that's a bad thing.

Plus, our corporate mail client of choice (Outlook) has done everything possible to make quote/bottom posting a skull-numbing exercise.

I will quote-post here.

> charge.) If you change topics, change the Subject: line.
> 
> Writing is often meant for others to read and understand (legal agreements excepted?) -- make it easier for your reader by various means, including

writing in forums and mailing lists is *always* meant for others to read.

> liberal use of whitespace and minimal use of (obscure?) jargon, abbreviations,
> acronyms, and references.
> 
> If someone else has already responded to a question, decide whether any
> response you add will be helpful or not ...
> 
> A picture is worth a thousand words -- divide by 10 for each minute of video

The above tip itself is not coherently phrased.  Attaching videos/stills is bad? Or preferred? Divide what by 10, exactly?  Video play time? Either way - sounds like a contrived metric that's not always applicable... videos come in vastly varying quality and levels of informativeness.  

Also, there is a 40k limit on attachments in this mailing list (as I mentioned recently in another thread). This limit provides little to no opportunity to attach good resolution still images, let alone videos.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.