Re: Fedora and LV2

I tried calf vocoder on my virtual machine (fedora 40). It seemed to
work fine - including editor,

Can you provide more info about the crash (output, core dump ?)

   Philip

On 6/14/24 10:34, chuck elliot wrote:
> ah! of course.
>
> ok. turned it on. restarted. found lv2 plugins.
>
> selected "calf:vocoder" for an audio track. RG crashed...
>
> Chuck
>
>
> On 14/06/2024 1:41 am, Ted Felix wrote:
>> Yes.  The feature is "experimental" and needs to be turned on in the
>> preferences: Edit > Preferences... > LV2 Plugin Support.
>>
>> Ted.
>>
>> On 6/13/24 5:00 PM, chuck elliot wrote:
>>> ok. with the 'qt5-qtstyleplugins' package installed and environment
>>> settings
>>>
>>> as below, RG now runs with lilv and gtk2 but I don't seem to have
>>> access to any lv2 plugins.
>>>
>>> I have a variety of lv2 plugins installed but the dialogue only
>>> shows ladspa
>>>
>>> and dssi architectures and only ladspa plugins, of which I have a
>>> couple.
>>>
>>> Chuck.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13/06/2024 2:22 pm, Ted Felix wrote:
>>>> Philip has figured out how to get gtk2-devel and lilv-devel working
>>>> in Fedora 40:
>>>>
>>>> > To summarize:
>>>> >
>>>> > install the qt5-style-plugins package
>>>> > set the environment variables:
>>>> >   export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=gtk2
>>>> >   export XDG_SESSION_TYPE=x11
>>>> >
>>>> > and rosegarden should work with the lv2 plugins and gtk editors
>>>>
>>>> See Feature Request 462:
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/feature-requests/462/?page=8#8b89
>>>>
>>>> Ted.
>>>>
>>>> On 6/12/24 7:15 PM, chuck elliot wrote:
>>>>> Confirmed - [76e11482] builds with lilv and without gtk2
>>>>>
>>>>> and lv2 plugins are operative.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/06/2024 20:11, Ted Felix wrote:
>>>>>> Just pushed Philip's fix as [76e11482]. Please test latest git.
>>>>>> You should now be able to build with lilv and without gtk2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Philip is looking further into the gtk2 issue.  I'll let you
>>>>>> know if there are any developments.  We are tracking this on
>>>>>> Feature Request 462, but at 7 pages it's pretty huge to navigate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/feature-requests/462/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/12/24 11:41 AM, Ted Felix wrote:
>>>>>>>    Ok, I'll see if Philip can fix this. Hopefully it's just a
>>>>>>> forgotten #ifdef someplace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/12/24 11:34 AM, chuck elliot wrote:
>>>>>>>> 'tried a new build with lilv-devel installed but not gtk2-devel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> build failed at the link stage:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /usr/bin/ld: ../librosegardenprivate.so: undefined reference to
>>>>>>>> `Rosegarden::LV2Gtk::getInstance()'
>>>>>>>> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>>>>> make[2]: *** [src/CMakeFiles/rosegarden.dir/build.make:127:
>>>>>>>> rosegarden] Error 1
>>>>>>>> make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:264:
>>>>>>>> src/CMakeFiles/rosegarden.dir/all] Error 2
>>>>>>>> make: *** [Makefile:146: all] Error 2
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so it looks like there is a dependency...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 12/06/2024 14:44, Ted Felix wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for tracking this down. Yes, the LV2 stuff can use
>>>>>>>>> gtk2, but it doesn't need it.  You should be able to install
>>>>>>>>> lilv-devel without gtk2-devel and that might work.  Let me
>>>>>>>>> know how it goes if you try it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Note: A fresh clone shouldn't be necessary. Just delete your
>>>>>>>>> build directory, create a new one, switch into it and run
>>>>>>>>> cmake again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ted.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/11/24 4:40 AM, chuck elliot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ...but a fresh git clone of RG is now compiling without
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> gtk2-devel and lilv-devel...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cmake has disabled LILV support....
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...now it runs again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/06/2024 11:10 pm, Chris Fancsy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> DuckDuckGo was unable to verify sender identity
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Chuck,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have the same problem with the compiled 24.06 version on
>>>>>>>>>>> Fedora 40.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I compiled the 23.12 version and it runs fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is from the LV2 plugin support which is using
>>>>>>>>>>> GTK2. I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't think there's a way to disable LV2 plugin support at
>>>>>>>>>>> compile
>>>>>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If I find a solution I will post it here.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2024 at 5:05 AM chuck elliot
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the link Ted but I'm afraid I didn't glean
>>>>>>>>>>>> anything useful
>>>>>>>>>>>> there...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> RG 21.12 runs ok on this system (lying around in
>>>>>>>>>>>> /usr/local/bin)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden version: 21.12 ("Cloud Nine")
>>>>>>>>>>>> Build key: ac38e2622f (21.06-24-gb9da2db9d)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Built against Qt version: 5.15.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current version info is:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden version: 24.12 ("Incredible")
>>>>>>>>>>>> Build key: 442818511e (24.06-1-gf91b7e227)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Built against Qt version: 5.15.13
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How would I be "requesting the gtk widgets"? I am not aware
>>>>>>>>>>>> of having,
>>>>>>>>>>>> or how I would have, done so...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I assume that my RG preferences would be applied the same
>>>>>>>>>>>> to both of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> above versions?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 07/06/2024 7:14 pm, Ted Felix wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just some limited searching seems to indicate that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "gtk" widget
>>>>>>>>>>>>> style was dropped around Qt 5.7 or so. Maybe you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running a newer
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version of Qt and you are requesting the gtk widgets?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=214147&p=2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    See post #36.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    All the trails are from 2016/2017, though. Not sure
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> relevant today.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/7/24 6:24 AM, chuck elliot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden won't run at the moment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The problem seems to be something to do with "GtkWidget"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (see below).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 24.06 built fine from git source.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have recently upgraded to fedora 39 and this is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably the first
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time I have tried to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run RG since. Same result on a similar/identical system.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gtk3-3.24.41-1.fc39.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gtk4-4.12.5-1.fc39.x86_64
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RG output:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.844: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> register existing type 'GtkWidget'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.844: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add class private field to invalid type '<invalid>'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.844: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add private field to invalid (non-instantiatable) type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '<invalid>'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.844:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_type_add_interface_static: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (instance_type)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.844: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> register existing type 'GtkBuildable'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.844:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_type_interface_add_prerequisite: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'G_TYPE_IS_INTERFACE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (interface_type)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.844:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_once_init_leave: assertion 'result != 0' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.844:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_type_add_interface_static: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (instance_type)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.859:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gtk_widget_get_style_context: assertion 'GTK_IS_WIDGET
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (widget)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.859:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gtk_style_context_lookup_color: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'GTK_IS_STYLE_CONTEXT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (context)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): Gtk-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.868:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gtk_style_context_get_background_color: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'GTK_IS_STYLE_CONTEXT (context)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> qt.qpa.gtk: Property name "theme_unfocused_bg_color" not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Falling back to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> QGtk3Interface::QGtkColorDefault::Background
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.868: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> register existing type 'GtkWidget'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.868: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add class private field to invalid type '<invalid>'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:12:47.868: cannot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add private field to invalid (non-instantiatable) type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '<invalid>'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (rosegarden:725222): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: 11:12:47.868:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> g_type_add_interface_static: assertion
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (instance_type)' failed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debugqt.qpa.events.reader:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [heap]  0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below
>>>>>>>>>>>> to unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below
>>>>>>>>>>> to unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>>> unsubscribe
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>>> unsubscribe
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>>> unsubscribe
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rosegarden-user mailing list
>> [email protected] - use the link below to
>> unsubscribe
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rosegarden-user mailing list
> [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user



_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user