Re: Fwd: Re: merging mono files

Jan Stary <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.sox
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Dec 10 11:18:05, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> What you are saying is right. I did find one pair of files that have
> different lengths of audio. This surprised me somewhat. Generally, the files
> are identical in length and carry the loop marks in exactly the same place.
> 
> Irrespective of any differences, I would still like to merge all the pairs
> of files into stereo. It should not be such a difficult task recreating
> loops again and inserting pitch tuning data. LoopAuditioneer does all that
> quite fast and what is left is to check that the loops do not present
> clicks.... again.... I can do pretty well and efficiently having done the
> job so often.
> 
> So, forget loops and marks and other data as the issue is complicating
> itself unnecessarily.

It seems to me that this is the gist of your problem.
Merging the mono files int ocorresponding stereo files
is a triviality. Losing the loops and marks means
you will _not_ have what you want anyway.

Do you intend to process each and every of the 2000 resulting
files manually in LoopAuditioner to recreate the loops?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/xeonphi
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.