Re: sox-users and sox-devel @ marc.info
Jan Stary <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.sox.devel,gmane.comp.audio.sox |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
marc.info is aware of the SF re-subscriptions and is takign care of it, so http://marc.info/?l=sox-users&r=1&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=sox-devel&r=1&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=sox-commits&r=1&w=2 (and other SF lists) will continue being archived. Jan On Jun 30 10:20:11, [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:33:34AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > On Jun 30 10:30:27, [email protected] wrote: > > > Recently, SF has asked each and every subscriber (it seems) > > > to reconfirm their subscription to all SF mlists. > > > > > > I assume marc.info is itself subscribed to sox-* > > > and that's how it gets copies of the messages (right?). > > > > > > What does that mean for continuing to archive sox-* ? > > > Does marc.info need to reconfirm all its SF subscriptions? > > > > http://marc.info/?l=sox-devel&m=149708246222731&w=2 > > Oh my - thanks for letting me know. Indeed MARC is subscribed with a > bunch of [email protected] aliases. And every one of those got such a > message over the past three weeks that I did not notice: > > https://marc.info/?t=149695721700001&r=5&w=2 > > Time for some scripted clicky clickies. I will start with the sox lists :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot