Re: sox/mansr: DSD to PCM

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.audio.sox
Message-ID <trinity-9cb1a7d3-7261-421f-bc3e-d1c8f3f59f1c-1589960806447@3c-app-webde-bs05>
Thank you Mans,

my question was a little more profound. I have linked 3 pictures that show the difference between three of many ways. Some filters are also used here. My question was about whether someone here has deeper experiences and has also made listening comparisons about the highest quality command for sox.

I could not attach my 3 example pictures (Spek): Every file 32 Bit Float, Sox-files linear phase. Here the download-link:

https://www.file-upload.net/download-14089057/DSF2WAV.zip.html

The Spek-pictures:

- Xrecode3.png output 352,8kHz File (Standard-output of XRecode3)

- Sox_rate_savL88200_gain_8_lowpass_1_25000_sinc_30000_n43.png

sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -s -a -v -L 88200 gain 8 lowpass -1 25000 sinc -30000 -n 43

- Sox_rate_savL88200.png

sox input.dsf -b 32 -e float output.wav rate -b 99 -a -v -L 88200

Regards

Thomas

[email protected] writes:

Hello,

does anyone have any experience with which Sox-Mansr parameters to get the
best possible conversion (noise...) into a PCM file? I found this one,
which uses Sox "filters". What does that mean?

To convert DSD to PCM, use the 'rate' effect just as you would to

convert between PCM sample rates.

--
Måns Rullgård

_______________________________________________
Sox-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-users
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.