(#317) Re: protocol documentation project (Re: Speak Free
Speak Freely Forum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.speak-freely.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Message posted to the Speak Freely Forum by John Walker on Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:30:53 +0200 (MEST). http://www.fourmilab.ch/wb/speak-freely.pl?rev=317 Reply To: (#315) protocol documentation project (Re: Speak Freely E Author: Johannes Po.... Date: 2003-08-01 15:11 : Forwarded from the [email protected] : mailing list: I would ask other interested : developers to start a "reverse : engeneering" : project of Speak freely producing a protocol : documentation. I would be happy to review a protocol document. In fact, I will agree to write such a protocol document and post it on SourceForge before January 15th, 2004 if nobody else does. I don't think there is any reason to document the RTP support, as that is thoroughly documented in RFCs 1889 and 1890--simply stating which transport encodings Speak Freely supports is sufficient. The actual Speak Freely protocol is very simple--the only tricky part is how the various compression modes are stuffed into the packets and how packets are padded when encryption is used. The control packets and information sent to the LWL server are RTP-compliant regardless of which protocol is used. * * * To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the Subject) to [email protected]