Re: Poll: Both ends behind NAT...
Carlos <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.speak-freely.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
<< I don't see why NAT is such an insurmountable problem! We simply need NAT server hardware and software that will keep track of where packets should be forwarded. Until we can get readily available modem/routers >>
I also use SF with NAT and works fine. I only had to map the ports and worked (well, aside that small problem with the microphone :D). As some of you have already stated, usually the problem is having a bad hardware or software, or that providers don't provide enough information to configure the hardware. And, of course, users that don't want or cannnot spend the time to read the hardware and software manuals (as I've seen with some friends of mine).
Aside all that, I'll continue using that great program.
--
Carlos
* * *
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the
Subject) to [email protected]