Re: Proposed Aim for Speak Freely
"Leonardo Boselli" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.audio.speak-freely.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | DIC |
| Message-ID | <3F3CB1C4.11860.231FF1@localhost> |
If you want to trasmt music at a better quality it mis more likely that you
want integrity than real-time . so a tcp trasmission would be bettere, and
anyway this is not an internet phone application.
You can _optionally_ put other codecs, but for real time telephomy
saving lag and bandwidth it is a must.
Even if you had a wide bandwidth connection, usng a low bandwidth
channel would always yeld bettere real time results than larger
bandwidth ones (consider if in the same wideband connection there are
other users ....)
Il 15 Aug 2003 alle 0:59, Bob Arctor immise in rete:
> i disagree.
> when you talk over thing like inernet phone,
> your demands expand, perhaps you would like to send background
> noises, or you would like to have audio quality enough clean to be
> able to reproduce your voice when you move around the room ,
> or even wanted to transmit some music .
> there is ogg/vorbis compression, and mp3 compression, both which are lossy. they introduce bit larger lag than usual GSM compression, but still quite acceptable.
> they're meant for high-compression ratios, and sound compresed using them sounds much better than using all other algorihms.
> you should check out mp3rtp.
> limiting bandwitch is good only in places where very small lag is needed.
--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo
* * *
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send E-mail containing
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body (*not* as the
Subject) to [email protected]