Re: Feature removal proposal

I really wonder what's so hard and difficult to utilize voice-activation
when it's available. I really didn't find it difficult to setup contrary to
what john walker said in his help-file for speak-freely. It reduces lots of
bandwidth and the delay-adjustment didn't help that much in my opinion, but
anyway i think this feature is valuable, i am just not sure, if i was using
it in a proper way.
Currently i am using sf 7.6a.
Regards, Attila.

> I would like to again reiterate my strongest recommendation (which I have
> brought up in prior posts) to retain a feature that was introduced in 7.6,
> and which you haven't specifically mentioned in your request for feature
> removal feedback.  That is, the feature that John added which he called
> "Adaptive Output (Audio) Rate Adjustment" which addresses the long
> standing and much reported "increasing audio delay" problem.
>
> I bring this up because some previous posts have tended to undervalue its
> importance, not realizing that many users over a long period of time
> complained about this problem.  More users than one might think prefer to
> communicate in full-duplex constant transmit mode, rather than utilize the
> push-to-talk feature.  It is much more natural and "telephone like."  I've
> encountered users who refuse to operate any other way.  It would be a real
> shame to lose this much awaited feature after having finally obtained it
> in 7.6.
>
> Also, of lesser importance, I would very much like to see the new (in the
> Windows version of 7.6) "Systray Icon" feature retained.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff MacKinnon, KB1RC
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click