Re: Doxygen comments in C++ source

On February 7, 2018 12:36:01 [email protected] wrote:

>> I hate Doxygen.
>
> I'm not here to argue about this.

(You know who asynth is, right...?)

My 2 cents: Doxygen sucks for reasons I've articulated with respect to SC 
help files (same problem: writing blurbs about functions and classes is a 
useful reference but it isn't documentation; in SC-land, we write 
references but seldom explanatory documents). But, Doxygen would be better 
than the near-total lack of any explanations of anything. It does carry the 
risk that we'll dox things without documenting them, though.

hjh

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com