| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.audio.supercollider.devel |
| Message-ID |
<CAB_zQYv2=zUeYies4sJjB5OXCXCSs7tOFm_KDAVQtPqzz8-8RQ@mail.gmail.com> |
OK, the git workflow page has been updated with the changes that Julian
seconded.
>> one option is to speed up the 3.x release cycle to 4 months.
> Please, or even 3!
I'd be fine with either of these things. I think we (maybe projecting...)
are putting too much pressure on ourselves to make the minor releases more
than they need to be. I agree that a few modest releases would be OK,
people might actually read the release notes!
-Brian
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:24 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> dear brian & nathan,
>
> first of all, thanks so much for pushing development of SC forward, this
> is really great, and much appreciated!
> Also, faster cycles are great news, and I am happy to help with those in
> any way I can.
>
> best a
>
> > On 09/02/2018, at 11:07 , [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On 8 Feb 2018, at 18:34, nathan-PB1wun9k+p9Wk0Htik3J/[email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >> one option is to speed up the 3.x release cycle to 4 months.
> >
> > Please, or even 3! We’ve been talking about doing this for ages, and it
> would just solve so many problems and render so many disagreements
> irrelevant. Worst case is some modest releases, but there’s nothing wrong
> with that. It’s not like we need to sell the upgrades to pay the rent!
> >
> > (How do we pay the rent, btw? ;-)
> >
> > S.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sc-dev mailing list
>
> info (subscription, etc.): http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/
> facilities/ea-studios/research/supercollider/mailinglist.aspx
> archive: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/marchives/sc-dev/
> search: http://www.listarc.bham.ac.uk/lists/sc-dev/search/
>